Solutions
Internal AI Assistant
One assistant for the whole team, with each person seeing only what their role allows.
Organizations that ban public AI tools rarely stop the behaviour; they simply lose visibility of it. A sanctioned internal assistant gives staff a capable tool inside your control environment, with logging, permission inheritance and a published acceptable-use policy. Adoption is usually immediate because the alternative was a browser tab nobody was allowed to mention.
- 01
Single deployment across departments
- 02
Role-based access inherited from existing systems
- 03
Drafting, summarization and analysis on internal material
- 04
Acceptable-use policy and staff training included
- 05
Full audit logging of prompts and sources
- 06
Usage analytics to find the next automation candidate
FAQ
Should we ban public AI tools instead?
Bans without an alternative move the usage off your network. Providing a sanctioned tool plus a clear policy is the more effective control.
What gets logged?
Prompts, retrieved sources and outputs, retained per your schedule and accessible for compliance review.
How do you measure whether it is used?
Weekly active use by department and by task type — a low number in one team is a training signal, not a technology failure.
AI Assistants
Assistants grounded in your own material, with citations, permissions and a defined refusal behaviour.
Knowledge Base AI
The answer your best employee would give, available to everyone, with the document attached.
AI Adoption
The difference between a licence count and a capability is a programme, not an announcement.